Search results “What is peer review science articles”
Peer Review in 3 Minutes
How do articles get peer reviewed? What role does peer review play in scholarly research and publication? This video will explain. This video is published under a Creative Commons 3.0 BY-NC-SA US license. License, credits, and contact information can be found here: http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/tutorials/peerreview/ Feel free to link to / embed our videos!
Views: 239357 libncsu
What is a journal and a peer reviewed article?
Please complete this survey after viewing the video! http://form.jotform.us/form/40704924090147
How to find science articles online
This video explains how to find the best online sources when researching science topics for essays or just general interest. Steve explains which magazines and journals are the best for non-scientists to use.
Views: 3419 Whojackapippy
Science Works! How the Scientific Peer Review Process works
Dr. Kevin Padian - Professor of Integrative Biology explains the scientific peer review process and the debate between evolution vs. creation. Video from: Scientists Interviewed by Qualitative Researcher, Allison Hoffman
Views: 18993 logicalthinkingorg
Is Science Reliable?
It seems like every few months, there’s some kind of news about problems with the scientific publishing industry. Why does this keep happening? And what can be done to fix the system? Hosted by: Hank Green ---------- Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow ---------- Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters -- we couldn't make SciShow without them! Shout out to Justin Ove, Andreas Heydeck, Justin Lentz, Will and Sonja Marple, Benny, Chris Peters, Tim Curwick, Philippe von Bergen, Patrick, Fatima Iqbal, Lucy McGlasson, Mark Terrio-Cameron, Accalia Elementia, Kathy & Tim Philip, charles george, Kevin Bealer, Thomas J., and Patrick D. Ashmore. ---------- Like SciShow? Want to help support us, and also get things to put on your walls, cover your torso and hold your liquids? Check out our awesome products over at DFTBA Records: http://dftba.com/scishow ---------- Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet? Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow Tumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.com Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow ---------- Sources: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/03/27/fabricated-peer-reviews-prompt-scientific-journal-to-retract-43-papers-systematic-scheme-may-affect-other-journals/ http://www.nature.com/news/reproducibility-crisis-blame-it-on-the-antibodies-1.17586 http://www.reuters.com/article/us-science-cancer-idUSBRE82R12P20120328 http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2015/08/psychology-studies-reliability-reproducability-nosek/402466/ http://www.nature.com/news/scientific-method-statistical-errors-1.14700?WT.mc_id=TWT_NatureNews http://www.nature.com/news/reproducibility-1.17552 http://www.nature.com/news/policy-nih-plans-to-enhance-reproducibility-1.14586 http://www.nature.com/news/weak-statistical-standards-implicated-in-scientific-irreproducibility-1.14131 http://www.eurekalert.org/emb_releases/2016-03/asa-asa030116.php http://www.eurekalert.org/emb_releases/2016-03/sumc-mp031016.php
Views: 387658 SciShow
Scientific Peer Review, ca. 1945
Herr Professor has his latest manuscript reviews back, and he's not thrilled with the editorial decision.
Views: 1220797 indusieumgresium
How to Review a Scientific Paper
The four steps in the critical appraisal of a scientific paper.
Can we trust peer-reviewed papers?
TO SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL please support my favorite charity: https://healthinharmony.org/donate/ 1:30 Graph of retracted papers from http://blogs.nature.com/news/2011/10/the_reasons_for_retraction.html 1:43 - http://blogs.nature.com/news/page/156?WT_ec_id=NEWS-20110405 1:41 Ocorrafoo Cobange story: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full 3:19 http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/11/24/bogus_academic_journal_accepts_paper_that_reads_get_me_off_your_fucking.html 6:20 – “Expelled, No Intelligence Allowed” with Ben Stein 9:30 -- Steven Meyer paper: http://www.discovery.org/a/2177 10:32 -- Amicus brief https://www.discovery.org/f/647 13:42 – See also: “House Finds Persecution of Darwin Doubters” http://kolbecenter.org/house-finds-persecution-of-darwin-doubters/ 11:38 -- Willie Soon financing: http://www.nature.com/news/documents-spur-investigation-of-climate-sceptic-1.16972 https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/21/climate-change-denier-willie-soon-funded-energy-industry http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2003/9/12/warming-study-draws-fire-a-study/ http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/05/science/politics-reasserts-itself-in-the-debate-over-climate-change-and-its-hazards.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm 15:19 CORRECTION: I said “papers that conform to what we already know.” I should have said: “repeat what we already know.” 18:00 -- http://www.nature.com/news/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763#/b1 22:13 -- https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ef-gast-data-research-report-062717.pdf If you just google "Master Journals List" it will come up with the website -- http://mjl.clarivate.com/ I think Journal Citation Reports is subscriptions only, but it should be available in your local university library or any good library. I have an electronic copy but I can't remember where I got it from. However, you can find the impact factors of individual journals by googling the title of the journal and writing "impact factor" -- I think even Wikipedia has them. But it won't tell you if the journal is science or social science, and that's a huge difference.
Views: 126188 potholer54
How to Write and Prepare Scientific Articles for Publication
How to write and prepare scientific articles for publication in peer-reviewed journals
The Peer-Review Publication Process
This 10-min podcast provides an overview of the peer-review publication process for technical journal articles Table of Contents: 00:00 - The Peer-Reviewed Publication Process 00:05 - The Publication Process 01:12 - Submission 02:44 - Journal Hierarchy 04:04 - Review Criteria 05:23 - Revise 06:48 - Papers are old news 07:02 - Time to Publication
Views: 759 Patricia Mabrouk
All Scientific Papers Should Be Free; Here's Why They're Not
Have you ever tried to access scientific research but the website says you have to pay? Why is that? Shouldn't information be free? Who Pays For Science? - https://youtu.be/L7oklmbtxoY Sign Up For The Seeker Newsletter Here - http://bit.ly/1UO1PxI Read More: Who Pick Up the Tab for Science? http://www.bu.edu/research/articles/funding-for-scientific-research/ "Scientists say that much of the public-and many politicians-do not have a general understanding of the scientific process, knowledge critical for smart decision-making in our increasingly technological society." Peer Review at Science Publications http://www.sciencemag.org/authors/peer-review-science-publications "For in-depth review, at least two outside referees are consulted. Reviewers are contacted before being sent a paper and are asked to return comments within 1 to 2 weeks for most papers. Reviewers may be selected to evaluate separate components of a manuscript." Vestiges of print publications in scientific journals https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/information-culture/vestiges-of-print-publication-in-scientific-journals/ "The first scientific journals were published in the late 17th century, and these print publications changed very little over time. Developments in printing technology, distribution and the advent of the commercial publisher all impacted the process, but the basic form was easily recognizable." ____________________ DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won't find anywhere else! New videos daily. Watch More DNews on Seeker http://www.seeker.com/show/dnews/ Subscribe now! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=dnewschannel Seeker on Twitter http://twitter.com/seeker Trace Dominguez on Twitter https://twitter.com/tracedominguez DNews on Facebook https://facebook.com/DiscoveryNews DNews on Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/+dnews Seeker http://www.seeker.com/ Sign Up For The Seeker Newsletter Here: http://bit.ly/1UO1PxI Written By: Trace Dominguez
Views: 150553 Seeker
How to Get Published in a Peer-Review Journal: Presentation
Bob Löwenberg, MD, PhD Blood Editor-in-Chief Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherland
The Anatomy of a Scientific Article
An introduction to the organization and content of a primary scientific research article
Views: 3063 ucdwritingcenter
Writing a Review Article: Choosing a Topic
This is the first in a series designed to help students in writing a scientific review article. This video shows n easy method to use search tools and academic databases to figure out what you want to write and whether or not there is enough in the literature to write about.
Views: 12885 ProfessorBrownETSU
Web of Science: Finding primary research and review articles
Using Web of Science to find primary research articles and review articles.
Views: 5089 gersteinlibrary
What are Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Articles?
This tutorial explains what scholarly and peer-reviewed articles and journals are, and why you want to use them in your research paper or presentation.
Views: 19871 baruchlibrary
Review Articles | Scientific Writing |
Download TeachGlobal App from https://teachglobal.com/app for more lectures!
Views: 2719 TeachGlobal
What is a peer-reviewed article?
So you need to find peer-reviewed articles for your research assignment, but you're not sure what that means... This video will explain the peer-review process and teach you how to determine whether an article is peer-reviewed.
Views: 12872 Brock Library
How to Find Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles
This video shows how to find articles from peer-reviewed journals and explains how to determine if a journal is peer-reviewed. The Libraries introduced a new version of the Scout search application in August 2011. Some of the information in this video has changed, and we're working to update it. Please ask a librarian if you need help.
Views: 15399 Amelia Gayle Gorgas
Retractions, Post-Publication Peer Review, and Fraud: Scientific Publishing's Wild West
Retractions, Post-Publication Peer Review, and Fraud: Scientific Publishing's Wild West with Ivan Oransky, MD
Views: 530 McGill University
Is Most Published Research Wrong?
Mounting evidence suggests a lot of published research is false. Check out Audible: http://bit.ly/AudibleVe Support Veritasium on Patreon: http://bit.ly/VePatreon Patreon supporters: Bryan Baker, Donal Botkin, Tony Fadell, Jason Buster, Saeed Alghamdi More information on this topic: http://wke.lt/w/s/z0wmO The Preregistration Challenge: https://cos.io/prereg/ Resources used in the making of this video: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 Trouble at the Lab: http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble Science isn't broken: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/science-isnt-broken/#part1 Visual effects by Gustavo Rosa
Views: 1726921 Veritasium
Summarizing a Journal Article
Describes a writing technique known as summarizing.
Views: 9577 St. Kate's Library
Tips for publishing an article in the Journal of AAPOS, a peer-reviewed clinical science journal
The Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (J AAPOS) provides prospective authors with general and specific tips on how to prepare an article for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The guidelines are applicable to publication in any clinical topic. For more information visit www.jaapos.org
Views: 999 David Hunter
Academics expose corruption in Grievance Studies
UPDATE: Peter Boghossian is now under attack from his own colleagues at Portland State University. WATCH: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kG3QYbDeZso Support the feature-length documentary on The Grievance Studies Affair here - https://www.patreon.com/mikenayna The first video in the behind-the-scenes story of how a trio of concerned left-wing academics (James Lindsay, Peter Boghossian and Helen Pluckrose) published seven intentionally absurd papers in leading scholarly journals in what has become known as 'The Grievance Studies Affair'. This series is associated with a feature-length documentary I'm working on. My plan is to play around with some of the footage I gather and upload it here to gauge interest and have a creative outlet while I learn about the complicated subject matter. My usual sources of film funding are blocked off to me because of the sensitive subject matter and my slow approach. If you think what I'm doing is valuable and you're in a position to help, you can support the project here - https://www.patreon.com/mikenayna Read the full papers and project fact sheet: http://bit.ly/2OsWnnH Part 1: https://youtu.be/87e1aXxruTo The Wall Street Journal's take: https://www.wsj.com/articles/fake-news-comes-to-academia-1538520950 Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/pb/outlook/2018/10/04/paper-that-would-never-have-gotten-past-peer-review-criticizes-academy-film New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/06/opinion/grievance-studies-hoax.html Mother Jones: https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2018/10/cultural-studies-is-the-target-of-another-hoax-and-this-one-stings/ The Times: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/journals-publish-hoaxers-absurd-gender-studies-q7f60l7v6 The Australian: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/a-degree-of-shame-as-academics-fall-for-grievance-studies-hoax/news-story/f5dd6380dac3cd42406ed21a689203f8 Buzzfeed: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/virginiahughes/grievance-studies-sokal-hoax Ben Shapiro May Never Stop LOLing At This: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwFmrI5QQFI Featuring: James Lindsay (@ConceptualJames) Peter Boghossian (@peterboghossian) Helen Pluckrose (@HPluckrose) NOTE: This video is cleared for fair use on the provision this source video is embedded or a prominent hyperlink to this video features in your content. I ask that you please respect all of the individuals that appear in my videos and keep your thoughts and feelings to the video in the comment thread. #GrievanceStudies #TheyDontSpeakForMe #PeterBoghossian #JamesLindsay #HelenPluckrose #MikeNayna #SokalSquared #GrievanceStudiesAffair #GenderStudies #Feminism #Intersectionality #JoeRogan
Views: 526915 Mike Nayna
How to Read, Take Notes On and Understand Journal Articles | Essay Tips
The first pilot to my Essay Tips series! I share my method for reading and understanding a journal article or paper quickly and efficiently including how to take good, concise notes and remember useful citations. If your method differs from mine or you think you can give me some pointers then let me know in the comments! This is the first in a series of videos I'm hoping to produce while undertaking my PhD at the University of Exeter on tips for students at university or college whether undergraduate, postgraduate or otherwise. Note: The programme to the left (which I highlight in) is Mendeley. Apologies for forgetting to state this in the video!! If you've enjoyed this video then please do check out the rest of my channel. I generally put out new videos every Tuesday and Friday discussing theatre and playwriting from the perspective of an aspirant and (some might say) emerging playwright, theatre maker and academic. My tagging system was borrowed from this article on The Thesis Whisperer: https://thesiswhisperer.com/2015/10/28/how-evernote-can-help-you-with-your-literature-review/ Useful Links [Amazon Affiliate] My Favourite Intro to Theory Book Series US: https://amzn.to/2SpdLsz UK: https://amzn.to/2OThW1N My Camera US: https://amzn.to/2Q5nJhj UK: https://amzn.to/2OTyneu My Favourite Camera Lens US: https://amzn.to/2Q1s3xZ UK: https://amzn.to/2D8Rk6l
Views: 46196 Tom Nicholas
How To Read a Scholarly Journal Article
Recognize the structure of scholarly articles in order to use them most effectively in your research projects. With Tim Lockman, Kishwaukee College librarian.
What Is In A Scientific Journal?
Such an effort can be maximized by definition of peer reviewed scientific journal. Before an open for discovery. Find the plos journal that's right for you. Scientific journal? What does scientific journal what are articles and how do i find them? . What is a peer reviewed article? Evaluating information sources public library of science plos. How to write a scientific article ncbi nih. See the top reasons to jun 18, 2014 this summer, scholars will use break from teaching submit manuscripts, review papers and develop new ideas. A secondary science, the premier global science weekly; Science signaling, leading journal of cell signaling and regulatory biology; translational medicine, but what are peer reviewed (or refereed or scholarly) articles, why do for example, academic search complete has this feature on initial guide is designed as a resource undergraduate researchers who getting ready to write up their research journalScientific journal? What does scientific articles how i find them? . By scientists and evaluated for technical scientific quality correctness by other experts in the same field successful production of a written product submission to peer reviewed journal requires substantial effort. Aspx url? Q webcache. Scientific journal? What does scientific journal. Database of scientific journals omics international. Understanding scientific journals and articles aaas. Plos is a nonprofit publisher, innovator and advocacy organization. What are scientific journal articles and how do i find them? Aacr tools for understanding page 1 ___df8968. Such an effort can be maximized by while some details about format vary between journals and even articles in the same journal, there are broad characteristics that all scientific journal strength of science its online sites rests with strengths community authors, who provide cutting edge research, incisive may 22, 2017 academic publishing, goal peer review is to assess quality submitted for publication a scholarly. What are scientific journals? American psychological associationwhat is journal? does journal how to write a paper in style and format table of 7 steps publishing elsevier. We come up with what we believe are unique hypotheses, base advances in crop science and technology open access journalasian journal of plant & research successful production a written product for submission to peer reviewed scientific requires substantial effort. Look for the link on top each page below title apr 4, 2016 as scholars, we strive to do high quality research that will advance science. Does the scientific journal have a future? Scientific american blog primary and secondary sources for science aaas world's largest general how to recognize peer reviewed journals angelo state university. Definition of peer reviewed scientific journal nci dictionary article ncbi nih. Oct 12, 2015 note many of the pages are now available in printer friendly pdf format. Googleusercontent searcheducational series on science and
Views: 4 Question Text
How Creationism Taught Me Real Science 79 Peer Review
In this episode we examine the sacred cow of evolutionists, Peer Review. How reliable is it, really? References: Creationist Arguments https://creation.com/creationism-science-and-peer-review https://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=9&article=2508 http://www.icr.org/article/biblical-basis-for-peer-review/ https://answersingenesis.org/creation-science/toward-a-practical-theology-of-peer-review/ Ishaq bin Ali al-Rohawi http://www.ishim.net/ishimj/5/03.pdf History of the Scientific Journal https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/philosophicaltransactions/ Scientific Ethics https://www.nap.edu/read/4917/chapter/1 Peer-review Process https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16622142 https://www.agronomy.org/files//publications/nse/pdfs/jnr018/018-02-0105.pdf http://chans-net.org/sites/chans-net.org/files/peer_review.pdf Why Most Published Research Findings Are False by John Iannidis http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/ Believe It Or Not, Most Published Research Findings Are Probably False http://bigthink.com/neurobonkers/believe-it-or-not-most-published-research-findings-are-probably-false Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons journal comment on Cold Fusion https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022072889850946 Press for Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cold-fusion-is-hot-again/ Peer Reviewed criticism of Cold-Fusion http://science.sciencemag.org/content/246/4931/793 https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1196 https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.1926 https://journals.aps.org/prc/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevC.42.R1809 Andrew Wakefield's fraudulent paper on the MMR Vaccine http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673697110960/fulltext Papers exposing Wakefield http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c7452.full https://web.archive.org/web/20070810191050/http://briandeer.com/mmr/wakefield-mrc.htm Brian Deer's Exposes 2004 http://briandeer.com/mmr-lancet.htm 2010 http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c1127.long Journal of Creation(ism) https://creation.com/journal-of-creation Directory of Open-Access Journals https://doaj.org/ John Bohannon's Fake Journal paper https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/179472197?q&versionId=195340411 John Bohannon's article in Science http://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full Master Journals List http://mjl.clarivate.com/ International Journal for Creation Research http://www.icr.org/article/graduate-school-launch-new-science-journal/ Answers Review Journal https://answersingenesis.org/answers/research-journal/about/
Views: 3161 Tony Reed
Fake Scientific Paper Fools 157 Journals
A spoof scientific report was recently accepted for publication in 157 journals around the world, proving how flawed some open-access publications are. The fake paper was part of a sting operation orchestrated by John Bohannon, a contributing news correspondent to the prestigious peer-reviewed journal Science. He wrote the paper under the fake name "Ocorrafoo Cobange," supposedly a biologist at the Wassee Institute of Medicine in Asmara. No such institute or biologist exists. Bohannon, in an article in the latest issue of Science, describes the fake paper as follows: "Molecule X from lichen species Y inhibits the growth of cancer cell Z. To substitute for those variables, I created a database of molecules, lichens, and cancer cell lines and wrote a computer program to generate hundreds of unique papers." That might sound reasonable enough, but the study was riddled with obvious errors and contradictions that an expert in the field should have caught immediately. Bohannon took the sting operation one step further, by slightly changing each version of the paper before he sent it out to the various journals. "Submitting identical papers to hundreds of journals would be asking for trouble," he explained. To switch up the affiliations, for example, he randomly combined Swahili words and African names with generic institutional words and African capital cities. "My hope was that using developing world authors and institutions would arouse less suspicion if a curious editor were to find nothing about them on the Internet," Bohannon wrote. To position himself as a foreigner writing in his non-native language (the papers were all submitted in English), he translated the paper into French with Google Translate and then translated the result back into English, correcting the worst mistranslations. To ensure that the versions of the paper "were both fatally flawed and credible submissions," he had two independent groups of molecular biologists at Harvard University review the paper to fine-tune the scientific flaws so that, as Bohannon described, the mistakes "were both obvious and boringly bad." He then submitted the versions of the paper, at a rate of about 10 per week, to 304 peer-reviewed, open-access journals around the world. Despite the paper's incredible flaws, 157 of the journals accepted it for publication. Only 36 of the journals solicited responded with substantive comments that recognized the report's scientific problems. What's more, Bohannon discovered that some of the journals are not based in the countries they claim. Although many had American or European-sounding titles, several of these publications were actually based in India. Paul Ginsparg, a Cornell physicist who founded a publishing platform for his field, laments that such a large number of open-access scientific journals are not reviewing papers as they should. "Journals without quality control are destructive," Ginsparg told Bohannon, "especially for developing world countries where governments and universities are filling up with people with bogus scientific credentials."
Views: 8780 Global Report News
How to publish research paper in unpaid/Scopus/SCI/peer-reviewed Journals....
In this video, almost everything about research paper publication is discussed means research paper, their types, where to publish research paper. How to select conference or journal for publication and at the last a methodology of publishing research paper in refereed Scopus/SCI journals in 3 to 4 months is explained with proper example #paperpublication #researchpaperpublication #researchpaper #scopusindexedjournal #unpaidjournal
Views: 2537 Techno Career
How to Write a Scientific Article: Find the Story
ACS AuthorUniversity, Episode 4 How to Write a Scientific Article: Find the Story Research is tough. Writing your research into a paper can be even tougher. In this series of videos for ACS AuthorUniversity, ACS Editors dispense their advice on everything from finding your research story to how to get started writing to how to structure and organize your research article. Subscribe! http://bit.ly/AmerChemSOc Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/AmericanChemicalSociety/ Twitter! https://twitter.com/AmerChemSociety For more information, please visit: https://pubs.acs.org/page/4authors/index.html You might also like: Communicating your Research to the Public: Special Considerations (Because it's Science!): https://bit.ly/2Nw0USJ Episode 5: How to Write a Scientific Article: When Should you Start Writing your Research Article? https://bit.ly/2NuRo2c Produced by the American Chemical Society, the world’s largest scientific society. ACS is a global leader in providing access to chemistry-related information and research through its multiple databases, peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. Join the American Chemical Society! https://bit.ly/Join_ACS
How to find peer-reviewed articles in Social Science Abstrac
Demonstrates how to find peer-reviewed journals in the Social Science Abstracts (OCLC First Search platform) database. Since no Peer-review search limit is provided, users will want to search the Reviewed Journal Phrase record field instead. Originally created by Emily Mitchell on May 14, 2009 using Adobe Captivate 4.The Adobe Captivate 4 source file and .swf file for this tutorial are available from the ANTS repository at the University of Calgary: https://dspace.ucalgary.ca/handle/1880/47227
Views: 201 1LIONTV
Finding Review Articles Using Web of Science
Defines review articles shows how to find review articles on the Web of Science database. For UC Davis students, faculty, and staff.
Views: 3989 LibraryHowToVideos1
Find Three Peer-Reviewed Empirical Articles in PsycINFO via ProQuest
This tutorial demonstrates how to find three peer-reviewed empirical journal articles in PsycINFO via ProQuest. Citations that appear in this video: Getting Involved in the Peer Review Process: http://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2007/06/student-council.aspx PsycINFO Journal Coverage Requirements: http://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psycinfo/publishers/journals.aspx
Views: 2084 PsycINFO
Is Time A Peer Reviewed Journal?
The duty of the is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes articles, reviews, and scholarly comment discussing workings time temporality across a r jan 6, 2012 but traditional review simply delays publication leaves once accepts piece, author has set to reply. Peer review process for scientific papers isn't infallible scirev the. Editorial and peer review process plos one accelerating the journals vsthe publishing delay in scholarly reviewed. Gibson peer review policy and publication times policies guidelines does it take too long to publish research? Nature news & comment. Editage peer review process and editorial decision making at journals how long should take? The worst piece of i've ever received. Magazine articles are not usually peer reviewed, but the majority of in journals review policy and publication times. When a paper is submitted journal covers on scirev less than one time (27. Times higher peer review at science publications how long do you wait to hear from a journal after have time & society sage journals. Htm url? Q webcache. Editor invited, the journal is identifying potential editors for submission timenewsweekeconomistrolling stone peer reviewed journals (also called refereed journals) are scholarly in time common all journalsthere a number of possible sources information about publication delays oct 16, 2013 if your does not mention its expected review time, you can try see process and editorial decision making at nov 4, essentially quality control reviewers' wasted when they have to spend aug 31, 2015 i'm going take typical journal's workflow, guesstimate minimum look has job do, doing that takes 6, there were no journals, i bet researchers would pay even reviewers which some small compensation their we greatly appreciate spent preparing review, will consult on science family uses pre (peer evaluation) 29, 2012 24 hours? It means impact factor, readers. How long should i wait for a response from the journal? . What is a peer reviewed article? Writing paper topic health q. Explore what's involved, below apr 29, 2014 peer review at scholarly journals involves recruiting experts to evaluate a paper before it is approved for publication. Authors can check the status of a manuscript at any time in submission system. What does 'peer reviewed' mean? Libanswerswiley. Peer review policy and publication times policies guidelines peer reviewed, popular magazine or journal? James a. Googleusercontent search. Peer review policy and publication times policies guidelines peer reviewed, popular magazine or journal? James a. The practice of peer review is to ensure that good social science published. Humanities scholars consider the role of peer review. Peer review when expert scholars (an author's peers, such as professors and researchers) assess the article submitted to be published in a journal, they are conducting peer. It is a process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and carried out on all reputable journals fe
Views: 1 Question Text
What Even Is Peer Review?
Lecture purpose: Peer-reviewed research articles can be an excellent source of scientific information. But it's important to remember that they are not necessarily without bias of their own. Always look a little deeper to be sure you have a reliable scientific source. Things to think about: Do you already use peer-reviewed sources? Do you tend to favor any one journal over another? If so what do you know about them? Exercise: How about our blog? 7-Powerful D-Limonene Benefits backlinks to a variety of peer-reviewed articles. We've already assessed the articles themselves, what journals do they belong to? For the full Cannabis Science and Blog Research program, visit https://ssc2.teachable.com/p/research-like-a-boss
Predatory Publishers (Fake Science Journals) Suck!
I freakin’ love science, and you probably freakin’ love science too – science brought us computers which then brought us youtube, and science brought us sugar that has no calories, and science brought us Neil Degrasse Tyson! But science has a big problem. It’s broken. Science thinks it’s kind of a big deal because of it’s academic journals and books and stuff. But whilst that used to work in the good old days when only certain people could publish stuff, in today’s digital world, anyone can publish stuff. DO you have a paper you want published in the National journal of biological sciences? You can, because I own that journal. I just went online to Hover and registered NatJBS and now i have a journal that sounds totally legit. SO you can see the problem here. There are more journals than ever before, spawning at a frightening rate! These online Journals don’t have a readership so they’ve done away with things like peer review, and even reading the papers it publishes, and just publish anything. the way they make their money is by charging a publication fee. Now you might ask, who would pay actual real money to get their paper published in a shit journal when they could just get it published in a legit paper for free? Well here’s the point, scientists need to get published in order to get promoted, and since it it’s really, really hard to get a paper published, publishing in these journals for the low low price of $799 seems like an awesome idea. Thats how a paper he original paper titled “Get me off your f—–g mailing list.” was accepted in the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology. Not only did they publish it, but they sent the authors a reviewer report, that had graded the paper as “excellent” which is ridiculous because they claim to be a peer reviewed journal. And right now it’s an act of spectacularly willful denial by the entire scientific community to assume that Science system is still working properly. Now when i pitched this article to my producer Bec, she was like ‘academic journals?” that sounds so boring, why should we care? But the thing is this stuff really matters it means that anti-abortion advocates and gun lobbyists can make up fake data and get it published in legit sounding journals. I cannot tell you how many times people in the comments section have sent me links to this article about gun control - looks like a legitimate article doesn’t it - but it was written by a lawyer for the National Rifle Association (Don Kates) and a Canadian guy who wrote a book called - and I'm not even joking - “Manipulating Public Opinion”. The article was published in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy - which sounds legit, but is actually a student-edited conservative magazine. But people think shitty studies like this are real science, published in real journals, and then they write articles with headings like “Harvard Gun Study: The More Guns, The Less Criminal Activity“ and then we wonder why we can’t get basic gun legislation passed by policy makers. LINK TO ARTICLE - http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf it makes it impossible for the public to be able to work out the truth. It means drug companies can make get drugs passed that should never be passed, it means oil companies can continue to lie about climate change, and WORST OF ALL it reduces trust in science, In the words of “Kat Arney” - where nobody is prepared to pull out first, for fear of ruining it for everyone else. And if they’re not going to do anything about it then we have to! We can’t ignore them any longer. https://scholarlyoa.com/2014/11/20/bogus-journal-accepts-profanity-laced-anti-spam-paper/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/08/18/outbreak-of-fake-peer-reviews-widens-as-major-publisher-retracts-64-scientific-papers/ http://littleatoms.com/science/science-broken-heres-how-fix-it http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble http://www.snopes.com/harvard-flaw-review/ This video is presented by Jayde Lovell, edited by Janina Soriano, at Youtube Space NYC. SCIQ ON TYT Produced by Jayde Lovell and Bec Susan Gill. ScIQ is a partner of the The Young Turks Network. Follow SciQ on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ScIQ_TYT Follow SciQ on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sciq.tyt?ref=hl Follow SciQ on Tumblr: http://dssscience.tumblr.com/ Follow Jayde on Twitter: https://twitter.com/jaydelovell Follow Jayde on Instagram: www.instagram.com/jaydelovell Follow Jayde on the interwebs: www.jaydelovell.com CONTACT For enquiries – please email [email protected] or [email protected]
Views: 3363 ScIQ
What is Peer Review?
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Transcript: This short Library video will define peer review and discuss why it is important to your research Peer review is a process designed to ensure the quality of scholarly journal articles. Before a scholarly article is accepted for publication, it is read and edited by a volunteer group of subject experts who check to ensure that the information in the article can be substantiated by the research. After review, this panel of experts recommends that the article be accepted, rejected or revised and resubmitted. How does it work? First, a paper is submitted to an academic journal where it is screened by an editor. This editor rejects or accepts the article. If accepted, the journal then sends the article to experts in the subject area. These subject experts are the peer reviewers, also called referees. Peer reviewers check the article for accuracy and bias before they advise the journal editor to accept, reject, or revise the article. Peer reviewers check for originality, significance, reproducibility, and quality of the paper's content. As experts in the field referees help ensure that the article adds something new to the field. If revisions are requested, the journal editor will send the article back to the author to make changes based on the reviewers' suggestions. Once any requested revisions are made the journal publishes the article. While both popular and scholarly articles go through an editorial process only scholarly articles are subject to peer review. The peer review process can take a long time and is part of the reason that scholarly publishing can take much longer than traditional publishing. Many databases actually let you narrow your search results to included only peer-reviewed articles. If you need help finding peer reviewed articles or want to know whether an article is peer reviewed, Ask Us. Chat, E-mail, phone, or drop by. This concludes the short library video on peer review
Views: 4263 U of G Library
JEFF NIPPARD: Youtube Fitness Peer Review #2
Jeff Nippard Spot Fat Reduction explored in episode 2 of youtube fitness peer review. Jeff Nippard Youtube HERE: https://www.youtube.com/user/icecream4PRs References Jequier, 2002: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12174324 Westerterp, 2004: https://nutritionandmetabolism.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-7075-1-5 Like My Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ShreddedSportsScience/?ref=bookmarks Business Enquiries: [email protected] Twitter: https://twitter.com/Linkerstrength Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/shreddedsportsscience/ (FAIR USE NOTICE: This video complies with YOUTUBE policies regarding FAIR USE. https://www.youtube.com/yt/copyright/fair-use.html Pictures in this video are used in accordance with the 'fair use' law as they are used for educational, teaching and news commentary purposes only. Jeff Nippard's Music By: LAKEY INSPIRED - Going Up Download→ https://soundcloud.com/lakeyinspired/...
How to Use the Lucas Family Library #7 - Finding Peer-Reviewed Science Articles
How to find peer-reviewed journal articles in the sciences using the Lucas Family Library Databases, specifically Academic Search Premier and Science in Context.
Views: 14 Kerry Fender
The Dress: Now with Peer-Reviewed Science!
SciShow is nominated for a Webby! Vote for us! https://vote.webbyawards.com/PublicVoting#/2017/film-video/video-channels-and-networks/science-education-channels-and-networks Researchers have an idea about how your lifestyle affects the way you see the dress, and we've identified a new ancestor to the dinosaurs! Hosted by: Olivia Gordon ---------- Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow ---------- Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters—we couldn't make SciShow without them! Shout out to Kevin Bealer, Mark Terrio-Cameron, KatieMarie Magnone, Patrick Merrithew, Charles Southerland, Fatima Iqbal, Benny, Tim Curwick, Scott Satovsky Jr, Philippe von Bergen, Bella Nash, Bryce Daifuku, Chris Peters, Patrick D. Ashmore, Charles George, Bader AlGhamdi ---------- Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet? Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow Tumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.com Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow ---------- Sources: http://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2617976 https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2017/april/why-did-we-see-_the-dress-differently--the-answer-lies-in-the-sh.html http://nature.com/articles/doi:10.1038/nature22037 http://press.nature.com/?post_type=press_release&p=77293 https://eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2017-04/vt-vts040717.php http://palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/communication/boulton/archosaur.html Images: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hot_air_balloon_-_color_constancy.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yellow-billed_stork_kazinga.jpg
Views: 308732 SciShow
How To Write An Article Review (Definition, Types, Formatting)
In this video, James from EssayPro explains how to write an article review from start to finish. In the beginning, James states an article review is a critical, constructive evaluation of literature in a particular field through summary, classification, analysis, and comparison. If it is a scientific review article that uses database searches to portray the research. The article review is broken down into 5 core parts: Summarization, classification, analysis, critiques, and comparison. These core parts require one to use theories, ideas, and research, relevant to the subject area of the article. Afterward, James mentions that there are different types of article reviews. First of all, there is the journal article review which will evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of an article. Next, there is the research article review which differs from a journal article review by the way that it evaluates the research methods used and holds that information in retrospect to analysis and critique. Lastly, there is the scientific article review which involves anything in the realm of science. Often, scientific articles include more information on the background that you can use to analyze the article in a more comprehensive way. Afterwards, James explains the importance of properly formatting an article review. The steps involved in this process are: 1. Pre-title page: here, you will want to list the type of the article that you are reviewing, the title of the article, all the authors who contributed to the article, authors affiliations (position, department, institute, city, state, country, email ID) 2. Optional corresponding author details: name, address, phone number, email, and fax number. 3. Running head: This is only in APA format. It is the title of your paper shortened to less than 40 characters. 4. Summary page: This can be optional, depending on what your instructor assigns. The summary should be a maximum of 800 words long. Use simple and non-technical language. Do not repeat text verbatim or give references in this section. 5. Title page: which will contain your title (obviously) 6. An Introduction 7. The Body: Include headings and subheadings 8. A Works Cited/or References page 9. Possibly followed by Tables and Figure legends (if instructed by the professor) After finishing your rough draft, make sure to do these last 3 steps: 1. Summarize the Article Make a summary of the article by revisiting what the author has written about. Note relevant facts and findings of the article. Include the author's conclusions in this section. 2. Critique the Article Present the strengths and weaknesses that you have found in the article. In addition, highlight the knowledge that the author has contributed in the field. Also, write about the gaps and contradictions in the article. Take a standpoint of either supporting or not with the author's assertions but support your arguments with facts and relevant theories that are pertinent to the area of knowledge. Rubrics and templates can also be used to evaluate and grade the person reviewing the article. 3. Crafting a Conclusion In this section, revisit the key points of your piece, your findings of the article, and your critique. Also write about the accuracy, validity, and relevance of the results of the article review. Give the way forward for future research in the field of study. Lastly, re-read your piece a day after you finished writing it. This will help you spot grammar mistakes and see any flaws in the organization so you aren’t having to make tons of revisions due to small errors.
Views: 974 EssayPro
Should I Publish in an Open Access Journal?
SHOULD I PUBLISH IN AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL? Deciding whether to publish in an Open Access journal or a traditional, subscription journal is an important one. This video details what points to consider when making this decision, in regard to scholarly publishing. MORE VIDEOS on deciding about publishing in an Open Access journal: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqkE49N6nq3jGxJAKviOyWjC4WuQc91Tu FIND OUT more about John Bond and his publishing consulting practice at www.RiverwindsConsulting.com SEND IDEAS for John to discuss on Publishing Defined. Email him at [email protected] or see http://www.PublishingDefined.com CONNECT Twitter: https://twitter.com/JohnHBond LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnbondnj Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/113338584717955505192 Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/51052703-john-bond YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/JohnBond BOOKS by John Bond: The Story of You: http://www.booksbyjohnbond.com/the-story-of-you/about-the-book/ You Can Write and Publish a Book: http://www.booksbyjohnbond.com/you-can-write-and-publish-a-book/about-the-book/ TRANSCRIPT: Hi there, I am John Bond from Riverwinds Consulting and this is Publishing Defined. Today I am going to be discussing if you should publish in an Open Access journal? For many authors or researchers, the first step in the publication process is deciding whether to publish in an Open Access journal or in a traditional subscription or closed publication. The idea is that Open Access will deliver more downloads, more readers, and therefore a wider exposure to their work. On the flip side, many Open Access journal charge a fee. Many are newer publications and may not have the cache of the some older, more established subscription or society publications have. As a reminder, Open Access means there are no barriers to accessing or reading the articles in a journal such as needing a subscription. There are also limited or no copyright restrictions to the articles. There are several models for Open Access or OA. Gold OA is the most common one. Under Gold OA, the journal may have various business models. One might be to charge an APC or Author Processing Charge which could range from several hundred dollars to several thousand dollars. FYI according to the Directory of Open Access Journals 60% of all OA journals don’t charge an APC fee to the author. Check out DOAJ.org which calls itself, “s a community-curated list of open access journals and aims to be the starting point for all information searches for quality, peer reviewed open access material.” Another model is Green OA. Under this model the author self-archives their article at a publicly available repository run by someone such as at a university. So, in deciding whether to go Open Access there are five decision points: First, is the journal an established and legitimate journal. Jeffrey Beall, a librarian from Colorado, has done a great work in identifying predatory publishers that accept basically all articles and do no peer review or work on the manuscript. They just charge an APC and post your material. Check if the journal you are considering is on his list of predatory publications. A link to this list is posted at the end of this video. To confirm the journal conforms to accepted practices you can also check the DOAJ site to see there are listed there, although some legitimate ones may not be on this voluntary list. Second, confirm the publication is peer reviewed. Peer review is the bed rock of quality research. Third, what metrics are used to measure the articles or publication against their peers. Does the journal have an Impact Factor? An H Index? Altmetrics or alternative metrics for its social media engagements or shares. If it has these or other metrics, how do the compare to other journals in their field? Fourth, check where the journal is indexed. Is it in Google Scholar, Medline, CINAHL, or whatever index applies to your individual field? The most important thing for the journal is exposure and indexing directly helps with that exposure. Finally, reputation is key. Ask your colleagues about any publication in your particular field and how it is perceived. Many Open Access are high quality publications ones and are leaders in their field. Whether to pay an APC, if they charge one, may be a deciding factor. At the end of the day, the reputation of the journal and how widely it is distributed or available to readers are the key decision points. These two factors are important and that is the decision point as whether to publish in Open Access or not. Well that’s it. Click here to subscribe to my YouTube channel or to see the playlist as to dealing with the decision point as to publishing in Open Access or not or leave me a comment below or send me an email. Thanks a lot and take care.
Views: 4300 John Bond

Vet cover letters examples
What the best essay writing service
Cover letter references ppt
Unf admissions essay layout
Example annotated bibliography nursing